It should be easier to repurpose household goods for those in need


One of the many challenges faced by those who care for aging family members who are downsizing their home, moving to assisted living facilities or who pass away is the overwhelming task of sorting through and disposing of unneeded or unwanted furniture, furnishings, household goods and clothes.  Most of us spend a lifetime acquiring “stuff” with little or no thought to what will become of our belongings when they are no longer needed or when they simply won’t fit in a dramatically smaller living space.  When our elderly relatives face a move or when they die and all but a few sentimental items and family mementos need to be emptied from the home and disposed of a frantic search often begins for a suitable way to repurpose a relative’s property.

I’ve been dealing with this challenge as I take responsibility for helping an elderly family member move from her current home to a nearby assisted living community and into a space one third the size of her current home.  The task has been even more difficult because I live 2,600 miles from my family member.

Downsizing 2

After dozens of phone calls to thrift shops, consignment stores, charitable groups, religious organizations, downsizing advisors and estate liquidators I learned to my dismay that it is very difficult to give away someone’s households effects either for cash or donation.  As Richard Eisenberg writes in his recent article:  Sorry, Nobody Wants Your Parents’ Stuff ( ) “the hard truth is that nobody wants the prized possessions of your parents — not even you or your kids.”

So what’s a caring family member to do?

There are businesses in many cities which will come to a home and clear out everything that is not bolted to the walls.  These entrepreneurs may try to place some of the more salable items on their showroom floor for consignment.  Despite the excellent condition of some furniture the reality is that many items are just not appealing to buyers.  I discovered that the table and chairs of a dining room set in absolutely perfect condition could be sold but the china cabinet is an anachronistic piece of furniture that hardly anyone wants.  The firms that clean out granny’s house may only consign for sale a handful of items.  They will arrange to donate rest of the furniture and household goods to charities with whom they work in exchange for a donation receipt.  But where those donated items wind up is anyone’s guess.  And those items which can neither be sold nor donated are likely to find an eternal home in a nearby public dump.

But what about the many individuals who are in desperate need for clothing, household goods and furniture?  Why is it so difficult to get those items from a vacated residence into the hands and hearts of new immigrants, refugees, or others living in poverty?  The sad reality is that there are precious few charities willing to take it all and then triage the items for distribution to those in need.  Most charities will select very few items and often don’t even have the facility to pick up things from the house.  They’ll accept what they have an immediate need for to put in the homes of a needy family.  But they have no capacity to warehouse items for those in the community to come and help themselves to clothes, furniture and household goods.

Charities that are in the business of providing social services would do well to collaborate and develop a shared facility and service capable of clearing out homes of ALL unwanted and unneeded personal effects making all usable goods available to anyone in their community in need of clothes, furniture and household goods.  By sharing the costs of warehouse space, trucks and personnel the burden can be shared and the costs spread among many faith based and secular organizations in a true co-op serving the poor and underserved.  It could be the ultimate Leave-a-Penny/Take-a-Penny system but on a much grander scale.  People with home goods and clothing to donate could bring the items to a central warehouse or have the items picked up.  And those with need for any of the items at the warehouse could receive what they need and either pick up the items or ask that they be delivered.

It shouldn’t be so difficult for donors to give and those in need to receive.  Give what you can; take what you need.

Take penny dish

Immigrants, refugees and others in our communities are in need and many of us have the ability to make things available to them that are no longer needed by our families but which could make a world of difference for someone else.  It’s time for the nonprofit community to step up and meet these needs in an unprecedented model of cooperation.  Private nonprofit organizations and faith-based houses of worship throughout the community should use this as a way for genuine ecumenical and interfaith collaboration, cooperation and service that no single organization could accomplish by itself.

Too much stuff

So what is the best advice for families who want to prepare themselves for the inevitable downsizing of a loved one or ultimately the final disposition of their property?  Immediately begin a process to dramatically pare down and get rid of items now that have not been used in a long time.  Don’t wait until you are under a deadline to reduce what is in your loved one’s home.  Repurpose items by working with charities, thrift shops and consignment shops.  As difficult as it is to convince a family member to let go of some of their belongings talk with them about whether many of their unused items can serve a higher purpose by giving them to others rather than by holding onto them.


The transition of a loved one, whether to a new and smaller location or the inevitable and ultimate transition at the end of life can be physically and emotionally challenging.  Change is difficult.  Letting go of personal items is hard.  But the satisfaction that comes from repurposing personal items for the benefit of those in need can be very satisfying.  The knowledge that the lives of others can be made easier and happier with the gift of items of a family member can provide joy and happiness to both the donor and the recipient.

Items that are not wanted by trendy or kitschy consignment shops, or rejected by charities that have no immediate need in site, could make individuals grateful and happy.  But the burden and responsibility of creating the right kind of co-op environment for all of your loved one’s rummage which could be turned into someone else’s treasure should be a shared priority for every community.

Ann Frank

For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

The time has come for single payer universal health care

Health care 4

The failure of the Trump administration and the House of Representatives to Repeal and Replace the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) should be a clarion call for a different approach to bringing the United States into the community of developed nations which provide universal health care to their citizens.  The time has come for a single payer universal health care system to cover all Americans.

Health care 7

Now, here’s an approach that should get support from those on both sides of the aisle.  Those who want to see universal health care coverage for all.  And those who would like to give a giant economic shot in the arm to American businesses.

In 2015, the average company-provided health insurance policy totaled $6,251 a year for single coverage. On average, employers paid 83 percent of the premium, or $5,179 a year. Employees paid the remaining 17 percent, or $1,071 a year.  And for family coverage, the average policy totaled $17,545 a year with employers contributing, on average, 72 percent or $12,591. Employees paid the remaining 28 percent or $4,955 a year.

The U.S. is the only developed nation where most health care costs are absorbed by employers.  Imagine the economic impact to American businesses if the responsibility for health care costs was removed from their financial statements.  Those savings could be used to reinvest in corporate expansion creating the resources for the largest job creation initiative in modern history.

Health care 2

So who would pay for the health care costs for the majority of Americans who currently receive health insurance through their employers?  The answer is the same way that health care costs are paid on behalf of citizens in all other developed nations…a single payer universal health care system paid for in large part by the U.S. government.  In short, a Medicare for all program with limited financial participation by citizens for basic health care coverage and the opportunity for supplemental insurance coverage paid for by Americans who want additional levels of coverage just as optional medigap policies are purchased from private insurance companies to pay health care costs not covered such as co-payments, deductibles, and prescription drugs.

Health care 5

Medicare gets universal high satisfaction grades from seniors who, it should be noted, consume a disproportionately high percentage of health care services.  The individual payment for basic Medicare coverage together with the optional costs for supplemental policies require far less investment by individuals 65 and older than the out of pocket costs for premiums, deductibles and co-pays by those on traditional employer sponsored health plans and even less than the costs of those whose health care premiums are not covered by their employer.

Individual contributions to help pay for a nominal portion of the cost of health care coverage should be means tested.  Those living in poverty would not be expected to contribute to the costs of their health care coverage.

Health care 8

For those who think that such a plan would cripple the insurance companies nothing could be further from the truth.  In the same way that insurers sell Medicare recipients supplemental policies that could sell similar optional medigap policies.  But it is likely that the exorbitant health insurance company CEO compensation may be flushed out of the system.

Health care 3

It seems to me that a social contract with all Americans to provide comprehensive health care coverage is part of the basic rights which is implied in the words of the Declaration of Independence:  “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

In the modern era, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said it best:  “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.”

Seven years ago, the passage of the Affordable Care Act represented the greatest contribution to the health of the American people since the first attempt at healthcare reform in the post-war era occurred during the administration of President Harry S. Truman.  President Truman recommended to Congress a proposal for universal health insurance coverage, administered and paid for by a National Health Insurance Board. (The article: “A Brief History on the Road to Healthcare Reform: From Truman to Obama” is an excellent resource for those interested in tracing the path of health care reform over the past 72 years.  This article can be found at: ).

The ACA is clearly an imperfect provision.  It was flawed in many ways from the time it was signed into law.  But it may also be one of the most politicized social reforms in the history of the nation.  Congress and the new administration had no appetite to fix what was broken.  They wanted it gutted, repealed and replaced.  But they were not able to get that done.

So now is the time for a bold approach to health care reform which will ensure that every American will be treated fairly, equally and humanely with the assurance that they won’t die because they cannot afford health care and they won’t go broke because they get sick.  A simple compact that embodies the spirit of the Declaration of Independence…life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Now is the time for America to adopt single payer universal health care because NO ONE SHOULD DIE BECAUSE THEY CANNOT AFFORD HEALTH CARE AND NO ONE SHOULD GO BROKE BECAUSE THEY GET SICK!

Health care 6

For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

My offer to write Donald Trump’s resignation letter

Signing a document

Let me say from the start that as much as I would like to see Donald Trump impeached and removed from an office he has disgraced and which he repeatedly disrespects I don’t believe that is likely to happen.

To bring articles of impeachment against a President requires a majority vote in the House of Representatives. When the case is tried by the Senate, a vote of at least 2/3 of those present is required to convict and remove the president from office.  The political reality suggests that this is an unlikely way to remove Trump from office.

I believe it is far more likely that Trump will resign the Presidency rather than suffer being ousted through impeachment.  As hard as it is to believe, my theory is shared by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) who has said: “Donald Trump is going to get himself out of office soon.”  Senator Feinstein suggested the President would quit before he was potentially forced out of office after anti-Trump protesters in Los Angeles demanded to know why more wasn’t being done by Congress to remove him from office.  And Senator Feinstein is not the first to suggest that the billionaire tycoon may decide to quit the White House of his own volition.

So when the day comes that the thin-skinned Trump ego can no longer endure the daily pummeling he gets from Members of Congress including members of his own party; the media (fake or real); the endless commentaries and memes that daily spread virally over the internet or the criticism and barbs he gets from foreign leaders it will be at that point that I believe he will decide to quit his part-time job as POTUS and retreat to his gold man caves in Trump Tower and Mar-a-Lago.

And when that happens he’ll need a well-crafted statement explaining and spinning his reasons for giving up the most coveted and powerful political job in the world.  And that’s where I could help him out.  And by out, I mean way out.  But out in classic Trump style which would enable him to leave The White House with his reputation and image not only intact but actually embellished.  After all, that’s the real end game for Trump – to burnish his brand.

I’ve served as the public spokesman for many major organizations which, from time to time, required me to issue very carefully written statements that were designed to say a lot without saying much.  So I am happy to offer this suggested draft statement for Mr. Trump to use when he inevitably decides to resign as President:

My fellow Americans: 

While I am proud and honored to be your president nothing is more important to me than my children, grandchildren and my dear wife, Melania.  And as much as you may need me to lead our country I have discovered that my family needs me even more.  It has been especially difficult to be away from Melania and Baron.  The prospects of uprooting them from the home and community they love to move to Washington would be a very difficult transition for them.  It has also been very difficult for my adult children and grandchildren to not have the head of the family close by and involved in their lives.

 I am happy that I was able to win The White House, bring victory to the goal of a Republican led Congress, and advance a nominee for the Supreme Court that will strengthen the conservative values on the bench.  I’ve laid out a clear agenda and put in place mechanisms which will return the government to the party of Lincoln with a strong conservative agenda.  So I think I’ve done as much for you as you need from me.  Now it is time for me to return to my family and business, both of which need and depend on me to be present.

 I am confident that Vice President Pence will succeed me admirably and capably and he will make an excellent 46th President.

 Thank you for the honor you have bestowed upon me.  Now that I have set the nation on the right path I feel that my work in Washington has been completed and I have done all I can do to assure the future success of our country.

 Thank you and God bless the United States.

 Donald J. Trump

Now it is worth noting that the only other American President to resign while in office was Richard Nixon whose letter of resignation famously only included eleven words:

Nixon resignation letter

Trump loves to set records so he could one up Nixon with an even shorter resignation message should he choose to just say these six words: “You can’t fire me, I quit.”

But that’s just not the Trump way.  Walking away from a failed project or suddenly shutting an enterprise down is his way.  He has abruptly shut down many of his businesses leaving behind vendors, employees and others stakeholders with nothing but an Out of Business sign and a padlock to remember him by.  Here are some of the Trump businesses from which he has walked away:

  • TRUMP: THE GAME (a board game in partnership with Milton Bradley)

So if Donald Trump needs a resignation letter written I’m his guy.  I’d be very happy to do it.  And by very happy I mean ecstatic.  And because Trump always likes a deal or is unphased when he stiffs his vendors I’ll make it easy for him by waiving my usual fee.

Mr. Trump, the letter is ready for you as soon as you are ready to order the packing boxes and call the moving vans.  And one more thing, sir, for the sake of the nation, the sooner the better.

Trump Moving Van

For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

Is the Ship of State sinking?


On September 27, 1995 I had the honor and privilege to be invited by President and Mrs. Clinton to a black-tie dinner at The White House.  It was an evening to celebrate the generosity of major philanthropists who had supported the leading children’s hospitals in North America.  I was asked to bring along to be recognized our hospital’s largest donor, David Packard, founder of Hewlett-Packard, whose contribution dedicated the new hospital for his late wife, Lucile.  During the cocktail reception I sat with Mr. Packard and we chatted for a while about the evening.  I told him that I knew of course that he had served in the Nixon administration as U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense and that he no doubt had been to The White House for countless dinners.  As a life-long Republican and no stranger to The White House I asked Mr. Packard why at his advanced age and with obvious physical difficulty getting around had he decided to travel from California to Washington for a dinner at the Clinton White House.  I assumed that because of his obvious political differences with Clinton that he would have declined the invitation.  Packard told me that indeed he had been to more black-tie dinners at The White House than he could count and that yes, he was also not a fan of Bill Clinton’s politics.  But, he told me, I have reverence for the Office of the President.  And when the President invites you to dinner you set your political differences aside and accept the invitation out of deep respect for the Office.  I’ve never forgotten that lesson from Mr. Packard.

And yet, while I too revere the Office of the President, I don’t think that the worst of its previous occupants have so stained and shamed the office in such a short period of time as Donald Trump.  Clearly I will never be invited to dinner at the Trump White House but even if that were to happen I would respectfully ignore the lesson David Packard taught me and never cross the threshold at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue while Trump was in residence and while he occupied the Oval Office.  There are just too many smells there that even a pinched nose prevent you from breathing.  The rot that is underway by the current President is a stench I just could not stomach.

The Washington Post’s coverage of Donald Trump’s Tweetstorm in which he accuses Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower is a comprehensive account of Trump’s most recent and bizarre child-like meltdown:

Dan Rather’s commentary seems to sum things up on what I thought could not be yet another colossal embarrassment by Trump.  But I was wrong.  He never fails to plumb new depths of self-humiliating, paranoid, and disgusting comments.  Read Rather’s commentary and see if it resonates with your own thoughts about today’s pre-dawn Tweets from Trump.

And then, read this commentary by Robert Reich:

This morning Trump went berserk, tweeting a series of bizarre accusations charging that former president Barack Obama orchestrated a “Nixon/Watergate” plot to tap the phones at his Trump Tower headquarters last fall in the run-up to the election. Citing no evidence, he said the former president was a “Bad (or sick) guy!”

Folks, we’ve got a huge problem on our hands. Either:

1. Trump is more nuts than we suspected — a true paranoid.

2. Or he’s correct, in which case there’s probable cause that he committed treason. No president can order a wiretap. For federal agents to obtain a wiretap on Trump’s phone conversations, the Justice Department would first have had to convince a federal judge that it had gathered sufficient evidence that there was probable cause to believe that Trump had committed a serious crime or was an agent of a foreign power, depending on whether it was a criminal or foreign intelligence wiretap.

3. Or Trump’s outburst was triggered by a commentary on Breitbart News reporting an assertion Thursday night by rightwing talk-radio host Mark Levin suggesting Obama and his administration used “police state” tactics last fall to monitor the Trump team’s dealings with Russian operatives. If this was the source of Trump’s ravings this morning, we’ve got a president willing to put the prestige and power of his office behind a baseless claim emanating from rightwing purveyors of lies.

So there you have it — either he’s paranoid, he likely committed treason, or he’s making judgments based on rightwing crackpots. Each of them is as worrying as the other.

What do you think? 


1. Trump is more nuts than we suspected — a true paranoid.

2. Or he’s correct, in which case there’s probable cause that he committed treason. No president can order a wiretap. For federal agents to obtain a wiretap on Trump’s phone conversations, the Justice Department would first have had to convince a federal judge that it had gathered sufficient evidence that there was probable cause to believe that Trump had committed a serious crime or was an agent of a foreign power, depending on whether it was a criminal or foreign intelligence wiretap.

3. Or Trump’s outburst was triggered by a commentary on Breitbart News reporting an assertion Thursday night by rightwing talk-radio host Mark Levin suggesting Obama and his administration used “police state” tactics last fall to monitor the Trump team’s dealings with Russian operatives. If this was the source of Trump’s ravings this morning, we’ve got a president willing to put the prestige and power of his office behind a baseless claim emanating from rightwing purveyors of lies.

The stain and stink on the Presidency created by Donald Trump will last for generations just as Richard Nixon’s desecration of the Office of the President created by Watergate.  Nixon and Trump have and will have soiled the Presidency.  Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.  I hope Americans will learn a painful lesson from the behavior of this current President and will never be duped again.

I wish I could look at the current President the same way David Packard looked at Bill Clinton in violent disagreement with him politically but with respect for the Office.  But for me, that’s just a bridge too far so I’ll have to wait until the next occupant of the Office of President comes along before I can look at the Presidency again with respect and admiration even though I may not care for or agree with the holder of that sacred office.

For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

Give but Give Wisely


Giving Tuesday is a global day of giving fueled by the power of social media and collaboration.

Celebrated on the Tuesday following Thanksgiving and the widely recognized shopping events Black Friday and Cyber Monday, Giving Tuesday kicks off the charitable season, when many focus on their holiday and end-of-year giving.

Yet most people make their decisions to give to charity based on little more than bumper sticker slogans and carefully spun information from professional and volunteer spokespersons trained to appeal to us in the hope that we will reach for our checkbook even without thoroughly vetting the worthiness, impact and relevance of their cause.

So how can we become better informed and more responsible donors? It may require a little work, but it is really not that difficult to pull the curtain back and let some much needed light shine in on charities.


Perhaps the single most reliable and comprehensive source of information about a charity comes from its annual IRS Form 990 (Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax) which most charitable organizations are required to file each year. Religious organizations such as synagogues are not mandated to file a 990 but most other 501(c)(3) organizations are. To find a 990 for a charity, go to and sign in if you have used Guidestar before or create a free account for instant access to their database of tax returns on more than 1 million charitable organizations.

The IRS partners with Guidestar to make all 990s available to the public for examination. Charities are required to provide the public with a hard copy of their 990 upon request, but looking online is fast, convenient and free.

What will you find on a 990? Just about everything you could possible want to know. The form includes extensive information about an organization’s demographics, mission and purpose, financials (revenue, expenses, assets and balance sheet), fundraising expenses, cost to raise a dollar, program services and accomplishments, board of directors and management, compensation of key employees, compliance with policies and procedures that help determine the organization’s willingness to be transparent, how they use their money, and much more.


Donors should spend as much time researching the performance and impact of charities as they do evaluating the performance and features of their next smartphone.  As with all consumer choices, the watchword for charitable giving at all times is caveat emptor – let the buyer beware.  And with resources like Guidestar and other tools that help donors make wise choices, there is no excuse to send money to any but the most effective organizations, which fulfill missions that touch the hearts and the minds of donors. For the sake of those who truly need your support, please give – but give wisely not just on Giving Tuesday but every day.


For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast

The shouting and screaming is over. The mean spirited commercials are gone. The daily animus has ended. The vitriol is finished. The nastiness, ugliness, lewdness and demeaning has stopped. At least for now. And hopefully we won’t see it return this way in our lifetimes.

In a matter of hours we will have a newly-elected President.  We will begin the peaceful transition of power.  There will be time enough for celebrating by the victors and their supporters, grieving by the losers and their followers and moving on by all of us.

But for now these two musical numbers put me in a better place and I hope they will for you, too.

Enjoy Israel Kamakawiwo’ole singing OVER THE RAINBOW & WHAT A WONDERFUL WORLD 

and Leonard Cohen singing HALLELUJAH

For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

‘Twas the night before the election

Twas the night before the election
When all through the land
All the pundits were spinning
With projections so grand

Campaign bunting was hung
From the rafters with care
By staffers who hoped that
The choice would be clear

No surrogates were nestled
Anywhere close to their beds
Too many visions of pollsters
Were filling their heads

People were glued
To their TV’s all night
Hoping the finish line
Soon would be close or in sight

The networks were frantic
To fill time with their chatter
About candidates some felt
Were like Alice and The Mad Hatter

Remotes were clicking between
Each of the channels
To see what was said by the
Talking head panels

It was dark in the East
And light in the West
America waited
To learn who’d be best

Red states and blue states
With their R’s and their D’s
Were counting the votes
To see who’d be pleased

The commercials were over
No more ads would be run
TV watching would return from
Frustration to fun

Analysts and catalysts were
Whipping up their crowd
Provocateurs and raconteurs
Were competing to be loud

Now Wolf
Now Anderson
Now Brokaw
Now Holt
On Pelley
On Kelly
On the bright ones
And the dolts

The hate and the anger
The nastiness and rage
Exhausted us all
No matter our age

Would it be him or be her
We wanted to know
Would it be left or be right
Which way would it go

Would we get gifts in our stockings
Or a big hunk of coal
Would our fav come up short
Or would they reach for their goal

Would we cheer as a nation
Despite who had won
Would we all come together
With the new era that’s begun

Will there be grace and humility
Will love of country prevail
Despite the hurt feelings
And the pain and travail

Will civility and pride
Be the rule of the land
So the nation can move forward
With a sincere outstretched hand

The campaign was contentious
And some said pretentious
So let’s abandon behavior
That’s demeaning and licentious

A new leader will be named
After the last vote is in
The losers will lose
And the winners will win

The nation’s not perfect
But it’s best among others
It’s time now to rejoice
My sisters and brothers

That power will transition
Without intimidation or gun
Democracy is the winner
It’s freedom that’s won

Let the past be the past
Give the new leader a chance
To start bringing us together
After the last inaugural dance

When the TV’s go dark
And the radios are off
When the last post has been posted
And the last vote has been voted

Sleep well America
Tomorrow’s a new day
The process has worked
There’s no more to say.

Except God bless our nation
And our President-elect
We can hold our heads high
And stand proudly erect

The peaceful transition of power
Is the price that some gave
So we might live peacefully
In the land of the free and
The home of the brave

And one thing’s for sure
Through the smiles and the tears
We can count on doing it over
In just four more years.

Social Media – The 21st Century Soap Box


When I dropped my completed ballot in the mailbox I joined with 20 million other Americans who have or will vote early and avoid lines at polling places on November 8.  Early voters are typically those whose minds have been made up for some time and who are not among those who still remain undecided about one or more candidates or issues.  Despite the fact that I’ve already voted I’m not inclined to refrain from political posts on social media.  That’s just not very likely to happen at least until the acceptance and concession statements have been made on Election Night. If I can sway one undecided voter between now and then it will have been worth it.


I realize that some may have “unfriended” or “unfollowed” me. If so, that’s the price I’m prepared to pay for engaging (some may say over-engaging) in this Presidential campaign.  I guess I could have chosen instead to volunteer to make calls, go door-to-door armed with leaflets and talking points or found other ways to be politically active.  Instead, I chose to make my own online commentaries and share those of others in the belief that social media is the modern day version of the soap box.


For those who may not be familiar with the use of the term soap box, the Boston Common, which dates from 1634 and is the oldest city park in America, was from its creation a popular location for soapbox orators to express a wide range of political views and ideologies. Standing on an actual soap box was the way people gained attention to express their points of view in the public square. Today, social media has become our modern day soap box.


This long election cycle is coming to an end. And with it comes an end to the tsunami of social media posts on behalf of or in opposition to both Presidential aspirants and their political parties. I hope that when all the dust settles on Nov. 9 that Americans of all political leanings will accept the outcome and move forward in gestures of good will and reconciliation both large and small. Despite the fact that it has, by any reasonable assessment, been one of the strangest and most contentious campaigns in history it has, nevertheless, demonstrated the uninterrupted continuation of our democratic process that has lasted 240 years.


There are many lessons to be learned from the way both major parties have conducted their Presidential campaigns. There will be time enough to do a post mortem on Campaign 2016 after Election Day. But for now, let’s at least pause to give thanks that despite the vitriol and animosity between candidates and their partisans we still enjoy freedom to exercise the right to vote for or against whomever we choose. And at the end of the day, no matter how the votes are counted and whoever may be declared the winner it will be freedom and democracy that will be the real victors on Nov. 8.



For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

My Long Road from Crystal Radio to Worldwide Broadcasting

My love of radio started even before my first day of school. I have vivid late night childhood remembrances of slowly and carefully maneuvering the “cat’s whisker” of my simple crystal radio over a rough piece of galena crystal until a radio signal faintly entered the earplug. Searching for something to listen to was like mining for gold. And the payoff came when I discovered a nugget – the sound of a radio station filling my ear with old time radio serials like The Shadow and The Lone Ranger or comedies like Fibber McGee and Molly and The Jack Benny Show.


Before long the homemade crystal radio gave way to a treasured AM radio on my nightstand. In the middle of the night I would carefully turn the dial to search for the powerful signals of the giant 50,000 watt clear channel radio stations located near and far from my home near Boston. Radio became my window into the nation’s news and local community issues as told through late night newscasts and provocative talk shows hosts.


Over time when the sounds from American cities began to blur and sound alike the AM radio was replaced by a short wave radio which, when tuned carefully, filled my room with broadcasts of Voice of America, BBC, Radio Moscow, and programming from virtually every continent and corner of the world.


But radio was limited to listening and I wanted to be able to talk to the world, too. Amateur (HAM) Radio satisfied my urge to both hear and be heard. And thus my romance with headphones expanded to include the microphone, too. It was the start of a lifelong love of the art of communication.


I grew increasingly fascinated with the way news and information was gathered and reported. Inspired by Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite, I developed a deep interest in broadcast news gathering. My first experience behind a broadcast microphone came at WCMO-FM, my college radio station at Marietta College in Ohio. I was asked to be a disc jockey which I thoroughly enjoyed. But when the opportunity to be a newscaster was offered it was like winning the lottery. I later studied broadcasting at the Northeast Broadcasting School in Boston and then I was trained to be a military broadcast journalist at the Department of Defense Information School (DINFOS) at Ft. Benjamin Harrison in Indianapolis.

AFRTS 2.png

During the Vietnam era, I was stationed on Johnston Atoll, a remote Pacific island where I was the news director for the Armed Forces Radio and Television Service broadcasting news on both radio and television. The highlight of my tenure at AFRTS was being part of the military news team that broadcast the splashdown and recovery of the Apollo 11 capsule carrying the first astronauts to walk on the moon.

Following military service, my professional career took a very different path. I learned that a career in broadcasting could be volatile and unstable. So for the next four decades I worked in the nonprofit sector specializing in philanthropy and marketing communications. But I was still able to stay close to broadcasting as one of the early developers of the Children’s Miracle Network Telethon which supported Children’s Hospitals in North America. For 14 years I produced local television segments for the nationally broadcast telethon winning a regional Emmy in 1984. I also produced more than a dozen compilation record albums to benefit pediatric medical centers.

I retired in 2013 as the President and CEO of the Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix but I still provide management consulting to charitable organizations. One of the joys of my new found free time is being back behind the microphone again as a broadcaster at RADIO PHOENIX, one of the largest community radio stations in the country with a worldwide audience who listen to the live stream over the internet. I am the producer and host of The Phoenix File, a weekly newsmagazine featuring in-depth conversations about the people and programs positively impacting the quality of life in the Valley of the Sun. Beginning October 25 The Phoenix File will air every Tuesday from 6:30-7:00pm.

I was interviewed by a Radio Phoenix trainee for a recent segment of the Bungalow Show. Listen to the interview for a little more background on me and my new show.


Guests on The Phoenix File will come from a variety of areas such as:

  • social service, social justice and human rights;
  • arts, culture and education;
  • advocates for equality on behalf of all populations with special emphasis on the underserved;
  • civic, political and other public affairs issues;
  • newsworthy topics covered in-depth with balance, fairness and objectivity;
  • nonprofit volunteerism, leadership and philanthropy;
  • effective and responsible charitable giving and nonprofit accountability;
  • community building;
  • and more topics as suggested by listeners.

The Phoenix File can be heard live at or with the TuneIn Radio app on computers and mobile devices. The Phoenix File is both a radio show and an online blog at .

My fascination with broadcasting has come a long way from late night listening to radio on a primitive crystal radio kit to broadcasting on a radio station heard throughout the world over the internet. While the technology may have changed my love for radio is as strong today as it was two thirds of a century ago.



For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to:

What have we become?


Since the formation of the Union, American election campaigns have always been contentious.  Mud slinging, vitriol, personal attacks, hyperbole, lies and ugliness are nothing new to politics.  But the 2016 Presidential campaign will doubtless be remembered by historians as one of our nation’s greatest political embarrassments.  It has truly become a race to the bottom.

How did we arrive at this place?  How did television go from images of Lucy and Ricky sleeping in separate beds to the regular, and some would say gratuitous use, of graphic sound bites which refer to male and female genitalia.  How did we get to a place when we read and hear more about a candidate’s marriage infidelity, boastful remarks about his sexual prowess, his sexual assault of women, his bullying, racist, misogynistic, xenophobic, and homophobic rants than we do about his specific political philosophy and policy proposals?

How did we get to the point where not one major American newspaper will endorse one of the two major party nominees and go so far as to break with their own tradition by endorsing a candidate with a political philosophy that runs counter to the editorial bent of the publication?

How did we get to the point where thirty days before the election, more than a dozen sitting U.S. Senators and numerous members of the House have rescinded their previous support for their party’s nominee for President or never endorsed the nominee at all?  How did we get to the point where the Speaker of the House of Representatives declares that he will not defend or campaign with his party’s nominee for President?

How did we get to the point where parents and teachers who once encouraged children to watch Presidential debates and campaign news coverage as a part of their civics education now keep their children away from the news which is full of content that includes graphic and explicit language suitable only for adults?

How did we get to the point where a candidate sexually objectifies women including his own daughter?  Where he demeans individuals based on their gender, religion. ethnic heritage, immigration status, sexual identity and preference, or disability ?

How did we get to the point where a major party candidate for President demonstrates a life-long pattern of legally and morally questionable business practices and who defies all requests for full and complete transparency of his tax returns?

How did we get to the point where a major political party passed over more than a dozen more qualified and ethically and morally fit candidates in favor of a nominee that may be held responsible for the destruction of what has often been called the party of Lincoln?

What have we become?  What has become of us as a nation?  How did we get to this point?  And most importantly what is to become of us in the future?

When will we be able to return to a time when, to paraphrase Dr. Martin Luther King, candidates will be judged by the content of their policies and not by the deficits in their character?

It is often easier to diagnosis the problem than it is to prescribe the remedy.  We have always been a hopeful nation full of optimism and aspiration.  And while we may have many reasons to believe that the future is bright we should be very concerned about the dark storm clouds that may be blocking the sun from our political process.  And now more than ever we need all the sunshine we can get because sunshine can be the best disinfectant for a process that has sadly been defiled.

Presidential historians, political pundits, academicians, and other analysts will study the many factors that brought us to this point.  Whatever they and others identify as the causative factors, what will be most important will be our ability as a nation to learn from our mistakes and commit to never repeat them again.  Our Democracy cannot afford to have its central pillar eroded by our most recent experience.  We need to marshal all of our goodwill, our national brilliance and energy to ensure that what has become of us will not be what we have become for the future.


For more commentaries by Stu Turgel go to: